Ironically, Flood Control is Flooding New Orleans

Katrina floodwaters. Photo courtesy of ABC News

Man-made flood-control systems—such as levees, upstream dams, and canals—continue to be responsible for widespread damage to the New Orleans and Louisiana landscapes.

The levees and canals on the Mississippi River provide infrastructure for oil excavation, shipping, and land development, yet they are the primary culprits in the degradation of natural wetlands. Many other ecosystems changes, such as deforestation, species invasion, and land cultivation, have also contributed to wetland loss in the region.

Wetlands act as natural speed bumps for severe weather. Storm waters lose energy as they pass over swamps, marshes, or mangrove forests, which helps reduce flooding. One study found that two to four miles of wetlands lessen a storm surge height by up to 12 inches.

Unfortunately, the coastal wetlands that provide this protection are disappearing rapidly. Louisiana has been losing up to 40 square miles of marsh per year for several decades. In other words, a football-field-sized segment of wetland disappears into open water every 30 minutes. The open sea has advanced some 20 miles inland due to wetland degeneration.

In its natural state, the Mississippi River periodically changed course within a 200-mile wide arc known as the Mississippi Delta. The delta forms as the river deposits silt over time, creating land mass and wetlands. Historically, this counteracted the natural subsidence that occurred in the region by flooding low lying areas and replacing the soil that was lost. In contrast, levees confine the Mississippi River to one path. As a result, the Mississippi is depositing its silt deep into the Gulf of Mexico and the Delta is sinking. Additional sinking results from underground oil, gas, and water extraction.

The impact of human activity in southern Louisiana became painfully clear when Hurricane Katrina hit in August 2005. Ecosystem degradation, and in particular the loss of wetlands and the shoreline protection ecosystem services they provide, contributed to the devastating scale of the disaster. Eighty percent of New Orleans flooded, power was out across four states for several weeks, over 1,000 people drowned, and levels of pollution were extreme. The economic damage of Katrina has been estimated to be in the range of $200 billion.

To quote Albert Einstein, “the significant problems we face cannot be solved with the same level of thinking used when we created them.” The State of Louisiana has estimated that economic losses from public-use and infrastructure would be $137 billion over 50 years if wetland loss were to continue unchecked. It is expensive to recreate the storm and flood protection services of wetlands once they are lost, yet maintaining and protecting them continues to be ignored. To date, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has used most of its allocated $7 billion reconstruction budget for traditional engineering projects.

WRI has a new report, Ecosystem Services: A Guide for Decision Makers, which will help people avoid the inadvertent loss of ecosystem services and connect nature’s health to the achievement of social and economic goals.

  • Karen Bennett, Research Program Coordinator

    Karen Bennett is a Research Program Coordinator at the World Resources Institute.

6 Comments

Comments expressed on this page are opinions of the authors themselves, and not positions of the World Resources Institute. WRI reserves the right to remove any comments that it considers inappropriate or spam.

The open sea has advanced 20 miles inland? Wow! Mankind can sure change the planet. Let's hope we change it for the better than the worse most of the time!

Thanks for your comment. My main message is that there are consequences to our actions that weren’t previously realized. Most of us have long recognized that humans have impacts on the natural world, but I wanted to emphasize that we also depend on the environment for our livelihoods. Incorporating ecosystem services into policy planning helps us identify risks, such as exposing millions of people to the effects of storms. It also helps us identify new opportunities, like using natural barriers like pre-existing wetlands instead of having to build storm walls.

The implied answer seems to

The implied answer seems to be clear.

We must stop all future development.
We must dismantle all existing development of the Mississippi River Basin.
We must dismantle all existing flood control projects.
We must abandon New Orleans to it's natural state immediately.

Would there by any impact or cost in doing that?
Let me know, I'm curious.

Oh, I almost forgot.
World Resources Institute wants your donations.
That is the purpose of this article.

This is really cool Karen

This is really cool Karen thanks 4 your help!

Thanks for this. Good

Thanks for this. Good reading (should be obvious for most) nice that its been addressed.

Interesting Read

Interesting stuff, Karen. I like how you bring WRI's intl research in to discuss a national problem.