A first-hand tour of CCS sites in China suggests possibilities for cooperation with the United States—to their mutual benefit.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology involves capturing carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use (coal, oil, and natural gas) and some industrial processes, (such as cement production) and storing it permanently underground. As the world’s two largest CO2-emitting countries, the United States and China are in a unique position to act together to advance CCS deployment worldwide. Both Peng China (PDF) and the U.S. already have significant CCS R&D programs, but there is growing consensus that China and the U.S. together could develop CCS more quickly than if they acted alone. The announcement last week by Energy Secretary Chu of a U.S.-China Joint Clean Energy Research Center—with CCS as one of the research tracks—is a good step forward.
Last month, a team of American CCS experts (led by Tsinghua University and WRI) got a first-hand look at China’s latest CCS development efforts. The team is part of a steering committee to develop environmental regulatory guidelines for responsible CCS deployment in China, an effort supported by the Asia Pacific Partnership. Here are a few of WRI’s key findings, based on the site visits (summaries of two visits are below) and subsequent meetings of the steering committee:
- Despite the costs associated with CCS technology, China is further along than many might expect. For instance, China’s substantial experience in coal gasification (gained in a large part with recent projects that convert coal to other products), provides opportunities for CCS-ready CO2. (Our group saw more gasifiers in one-week in China than are operating today in the United States) China has announced plans to begin underground CO2 storage at research scales later this year.
- China’s energy projects are very large in scale, millions of tons/year of coal per site, and get quick approval (finding ways to reduce emissions from these facilities is essential in making global reductions in carbon dioxide emissions).
- Chinese industry is being proactive and together with government they are pushing the envelope with respect to innovation and plant efficiency
- There are opportunities to collaborate on demonstrating CO2 storage in China using the carbon dioxide from industrial sources.
Below is a short description of two of the sites the CCS team visited during its visit to China—sites which provide opportunities for near term on-the-ground CCS demonstrations in China:
Shenhua Direct Coal to Liquids Plant in Ordos, Inner Mongolia
This project (approximately 10 billion RMB, or $1.46 billion) is a first-of-its-kind facility (PDF, 2.5 Mb) which employs a Chinese-developed technology for direct coal liquefaction (DCL). The project was initiated in 2004 and completed a successful first commissioning with 303 hours of successful operations last December. The plant will soon conduct a second, 1,000 hour commissioning with full-scale operations to follow. The geology in the region looks promising, with an estimated 4.4 billion tons of CO2 storage capacity in saline formations in the Ordos basin. Geologic storage site selection and characterization efforts are underway with an anticipated CCS demonstration injecting 100,000 tons per year beginning in late 2009.

GreenGen IGCC Power Plant, Tianjin
GreenGen is China’s most prominent IGCC project, owned by a consortium of all of China’s major power producers, led by Huaneng, its top coal producer, Shenhua, and potential participation by Peabody Energy. Construction of the 250MW IGCC plant began in 2008, and NDRC granted final approval in May 2009. The project will use hydrogen turbines, and a 400MW addition is planned for 2014-2016. This second phase will likely include CO2 injection of 1 million tons per year for enhanced oil recovery.

Steering Committee Members
In addition to the WRI CCS team, the steering committee attending this tour includes many of the leading U.S. experts on CCS technology:
- Scott Anderson (EDF)
- Sally Benson (Stanford University)
- Robert Finley (University of Illinois and lead for one of the US DOE’s regional partnerships)
- Robin Newmark (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)
- Ming Sung (Clean Air Task Force)
- Elizabeth Wilson (WRI Fellow and University of Minnesota professor)
- Julio Friedmann of Lawrence Livermore, also serves as an advisor to this effort
In addition, the steering committee includes China’s industry and government leaders on CCS technology, research directors from:
- Tsinghua University
- China’s Institute of Mining and Technology
- Shenhua (largest coal company in the world)
- PetroChina (state-owned oil company)
- Huaneng (one of the major utilities, implementing China’s GreenGen project, and integrated IGCC and CCS demonstration).
Officials from the National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration also met with the steering committee.
Sarah Forbes, Senior Associatesforbes@wri.org+1 (202) 729-7714follow on twitterSarah M. Forbes has been a senior associate at the World Resources Institute (WRI) since May 2008.






3 Comments
Thanks for the update,
Thanks for the update, Sarah.
The real question is if Chinese CCS efforts are scalable. The answer is NO as a closer scrutiny of the driving forces of China's current CCS efforts and China's market structure for coal and power suggests. A full analysis will be released in August 2009 by the Program on Energy and Sustainable Development (PESD; http://pesd.stanford.edu) at Stanford University.
Thank you, Varun--I look
Thank you, Varun--I look forward to seeing your analysis! How different are the issues associated with scalability in China compared with other countries? Could an agressive RD&D program combined with complimentary policies that support CCS deployment resolve the issues?
Certainly R&D and
Certainly R&D and cooperation will help. Indeed, that is really the hope and the way forward for CCS. At the same time our view is that many groups are too busy making broad generalizations about the scale of CCS deployment in China. As you know, CCS is not a closed system. It interacts vigorously with other larger parts of the energy system, especially when talking about scale. In the context of CCS in China the other important issues to keep in mind are the coal supply chain and the electricity market. Any CCS projection made without a solid understanding of these two pieces is dubious.