| World Resources Institute | Home | Graphics |
| EarthTrends: The Environmental Information Portal | |
Dirty Water: Pollution Problems Persist |
| View as PDF | View Notes |
| Source: Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems: Freshwater Systems |
| Written by: Carmen Revenga and Greg Mock |
| Date: October 2000 |
| Summary: |
| Water pollution remains one of the most visible and persistent signs of our impact on the natural world. Cleanup of some older pollutants has been offset by new contaminants that threaten freshwater ecosystems and foul our drinking water. |
The sight and smell of grossly polluted waterways provided some of the original
impetus to the environmental movement in the 1970s. Nearly a century before
that, the dangers of polluted water to human health drove what became known
as the "sanitary revolution" in Europe and the United States, emphasizing clean
water supplies and sewer systems in cities. Today, despite progress in cleaning
up waterways in some areas, water pollution remains a serious global problem,
with impacts on the health of freshwater ecosystems and the human communities
that rely on them for water supply.
Nutrient Pollution: The New Danger The level of nutrients such as nitrates and phosphorous in freshwater ecosystems is a problem worldwide (Shiklomanov 1997:34-36). In most cases, the major cause of these contaminants is the increased use of manure and manufactured fertilizer in global agriculture. In the United States, for example, agriculture is the single greatest source of pollution degrading the quality of surface waters like rivers and lakes, with croplands alone accounting for nearly 40 percent of the nitrogen pollution and 30 percent of the phosphorous (Faeth 2000:6-7). (See Figure 2.)
Natural waters have very low concentrations of nitrates (a soluble from of nitrogen) and phosphorous, but nutrient levels increase with runoff from farm lands as well as from urban and industrial wastewater. Dissolved nutrients act as fertilizers, stimulating algal blooms and the eutrophication of many inland waters. This can rob the water column of dissolved oxygen, kill aquatic organisms, and degrade water quality. Dissolved nitrates in drinking water can also harm human health. Data on nutrient trends in global waters are spotty and only give the most generalized picture of current conditions. The relevant water data from the UN's Global Environment Monitoring System (GEMS), for example, only cover 1976-1990. Of these globally monitored watersheds, the highest nutrient concentrations come from sampling stations in Europe. Nitrate concentrations are higher in watersheds that have been intensively used and modified by human activity, such as the Weser, Seine, Rhine, Elbe, and Senegal. High levels are also found in such watersheds in China, South Africa, and the Nile and Mississippi basins (UNEP/GEMS 1995:33-35). In South America, nitrate concentrations in the monitored watersheds are relatively low and follow human land use. The highest nitrate concentrations are found in the Uruguay watershed, where some of the most intensive agriculture on the continent is found. Nitrate concentrations are also greater in the Magdalena watershed of Colombia than in the less densely populated watersheds of the Amazon basin (UNEP/GEMS 1995:33-35). The nitrate concentrations in South America correspond to lower fertilizer application rates, compared to Europe. More detailed and recent data available in Europe show distinct regional trends in the concentrations of nitrates and phosphorous in rivers. Nitrate loadings are highest in areas with intensive livestock and crop production, especially in the northern parts of western Europe. Nitrate concentrations are lowest in Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Overall nitrate concentrations in monitored European rivers have not changed significantly since 1980, despite lower nitrogen fertilizer application rates since the 1990s (EEA 1998:194-197; EEA 1999:176-177). Similar regional patterns are also evident in phosphorous trends. Rivers in Finland, Norway, and Sweden have the lowest phosphorous concentrations, whereas areas from southern England across central and western Europe show the highest levels (EEA 1999:174). In general, phosphorous concentrations have decreased significantly since 1985, mostly due to improvements in wastewater treatment and the reduced use of phosphorous in detergents. However, phosphorus levels remain a problem in most regions of Europe (EEA 1999:174). Despite some positive trends, the overall state of many European rivers with respect to nutrient concentrations remains poor (EEA 1998:194-196). Figure 3 shows water quality data for the United States for the 1980s. For the 1980-89 period, nitrate concentrations remained relatively stable, with most monitoring stations showing no discernable trend. This probably reflects the fact that nitrogen fertilizer use in the United States leveled off after steady increases in the 1970s. Fertilizer application rates increased for the period 1974-1981, and nitrate concentrations increased as well during that period. Average nitrate concentrations were greater in agricultural and urban areas than in forested areas (Smith et al. 1994:122).
Trends in phosphorous concentrations in the United States showed
greater improvement, with five times more states showing downward
trends than upward trends. Decreases were more likely to be found
in the East, Midwest, and the Great Lakes regions, while the majority
of increases occurred in the Southeast (Smith et al. 1994:124). |
| THE WORLD BANK | UNEP | THE NETHERLANDS MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS | SIDA | UNDP | USAID |
| © 2006 World Resources Institute | Contact Us | Content licensed under a Creative Commons License. |